Conservatives Promise a Predictable Energy Policy, but Lack Credibility

(by Catherine Waddams)  The British Conservative Party has produced an energy policy document titled ‘Rebuilding Security’.  They argue that if governments provide a clear energy policy, they reduce uncertainty in the market and so also the cost of capital for the substantial investments required in generation, transmission and distribution. The result will be lower prices. The general idea is sound, but it relies fundamentally on the credibility of the proposed policy. 

Unfortunately, ‘Rebuilding Security’ ignores an important challenge in energy policy, namely the trade off between its various objectives.  The four they identify are very like Ofgem’s current three – Security of supply, Sustainability and Affordability.  The Conservatives call Affordability ‘Economy’, and they add a fourth – rather mysteriously called ‘opportunity’ to “develop and deploy [the sector] to create new wealth for the country”.

Ministers of any political hue are notoriously reluctant to make explicit uncomfortable choices between competing objectives in any area, but this is increasingly necessary in energy. The challenge is both to appreciate conflicts in high level objectives, and to identify the most appropriate instruments for achieving them. The Conservatives rightly criticise leaving such decisions to agencies rather than elected ministers, and the proposal to ‘recall them’ to government is welcome in both the Conservative proposals and the Energy Bill currently before Parliament.  But the minimum requirement for elected decision makers is then to acknowledge where the hard choices need to be made. 

The most painful choice is between Security and Sustainability on the one hand, and Affordability on the other.   The first two will both involve higher prices; as finance is raised for new investment, upstream costs rise to reflect the true cost of carbon, and both are passed on to customers and final consumers – so threatening ‘Affordability’.  Are politicians prepared to face an extremely vocal poverty lobby, the media and the electorate with honesty over the necessary continued upward trajectory of energy prices? 

There is also a more subtle inconsistency over the means to achieve objectives.  Eight principles of energy policy are laid down.  The first and last are that “Conservative energy policy will… BE market-based” and “Promote competition” …. (their emphasis).  Unfortunately, the other six include the provision of prudential oversight, increased diversity, taking an internationalist approach – all of which are constraining the outcomes in a way which is inconsistent with competitive markets. It is ironic that this is the same mistake made by Ofgem, which the manifesto criticises, in introducing non discrimination clauses that are likely to stifle competition.

The strength of markets is that if they have unbiased information and incentives they can deliver outcomes which are better for the economy as a whole (and for most of the participants).  Competitive markets identify and provide solutions which central planning can never deliver.  But if they are constrained to deliver particular outcomes, the consequent strain and distortion may well make everyone worse off.     

So, one cheer for recognising that the government needs to make the  policy decisions and that consistency can reduce investment costs (not only in energy but across the utilities).  These issues are exactly those which the Next Generation Utilities Forum have been raising and discussing with stakeholders and policy makers.  It is good to see both major parties taking these ideas on board.  But decision making cannot be stable or predictable if it is internally inconsistent, so more work is needed before the other two cheers can be voiced.

2 Responses to Conservatives Promise a Predictable Energy Policy, but Lack Credibility

  1. Perry525 says:

    It is interesting that two vast stores of natural gas were discovered in the 1980’s.
    Stretching from Newcastle down to Devon and from the North Sea to Poland.
    Until recently the technology required to extract the gas did not exist.
    Now we have the technology and vast amounts of natural gas are flowing in the USA, where instead of importing, they are starting to export.

    There is a world over supply of natural gas and the price has collapsed.

    The French have started drilling in the south, we have started drilling near Blackpool and four British companies are drilling in Poland.

    So far this total change in the worlds power supply has been ignored by Government and the oposition. Why?

  2. […] of a trend which we had already seen in the dying days of the previous government with the new emphasis of regulator’s duties in the Energy Act 2010. This is good news for determining policy and implementing it IF ministers […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: