<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Competition Policy blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Competition Law and Policy blog by the ESRC Centre for Competition Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does the UK’s New Cartel Offence Contain a Devastating Flaw? by Andreas Stephan</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/does-the-uks-new-cartel-offence-contain-a-devastating-flaw/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Stephan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=827#comment-3653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter&#039;s article has inspired a piece on the policy choices surrounding cartel policy, published by Lexology: 
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c234f329-26af-475b-b357-90092eda9aca&amp;utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&amp;utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2013-06-12&amp;utm_term=]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter&#8217;s article has inspired a piece on the policy choices surrounding cartel policy, published by Lexology:<br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c234f329-26af-475b-b357-90092eda9aca&#038;utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&#038;utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&#038;utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&#038;utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2013-06-12&#038;utm_term=" rel="nofollow">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c234f329-26af-475b-b357-90092eda9aca&#038;utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&#038;utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&#038;utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&#038;utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2013-06-12&#038;utm_term=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Court of Justice’s Expedia ruling undermines the economic approach by eliminating the ‘de mimimis’ defence in object agreements by Antitrust Links of the Week &#171; Links Of The Week &#171; UpwardPricingPressure</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/06/04/the-court-of-justices-expedia-ruling-undermines-the-economic-approach-by-eliminating-the-de-mimimis-defence-in-object-agreements/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antitrust Links of the Week &#171; Links Of The Week &#171; UpwardPricingPressure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-3631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a recent European Court of Justice decision make a little-noticed major change in the de minimis [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a recent European Court of Justice decision make a little-noticed major change in the de minimis [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does the UK’s New Cartel Offence Contain a Devastating Flaw? by Just Between You and Me &#171; Criminal &#171; UpwardPricingPressure</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/does-the-uks-new-cartel-offence-contain-a-devastating-flaw/#comment-3611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just Between You and Me &#171; Criminal &#171; UpwardPricingPressure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=827#comment-3611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of last week&#8217;s links, about the changing cartel rules in the U.K., got me thinking about some of the policy choices [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of last week&#8217;s links, about the changing cartel rules in the U.K., got me thinking about some of the policy choices [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does the UK’s New Cartel Offence Contain a Devastating Flaw? by Antitrust Links of the Week &#171; Links Of The Week &#171; UpwardPricingPressure</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/does-the-uks-new-cartel-offence-contain-a-devastating-flaw/#comment-3600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antitrust Links of the Week &#171; Links Of The Week &#171; UpwardPricingPressure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 17:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=827#comment-3600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] An interesting wrinkle, with potential significant ethical issues for lawyers advising multinational corporations, in the new UK cartel rules. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] An interesting wrinkle, with potential significant ethical issues for lawyers advising multinational corporations, in the new UK cartel rules. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Competition Law as a complement to Intellectual Property Law? by Laura &#124; Dutch Contract Law Firm AMS</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/competition-law-as-a-complement-to-intellectual-property-law/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura &#124; Dutch Contract Law Firm AMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 13:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=820#comment-3587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting crossover of IP law and  / contract law. Good post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting crossover of IP law and  / contract law. Good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIS and the Cartel Offence: A Reasonable Attempt to Compensate for the Rejection of Dishonesty by Does the UK’s New Cartel Offence Contain a Devastating Flaw? &#124; Competition Policy blog</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/bis-and-the-cartel-offence-a-reasonable-attempt-to-compensate-for-the-rejection-of-dishonesty/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Does the UK’s New Cartel Offence Contain a Devastating Flaw? &#124; Competition Policy blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-3516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of these legislative developments should be welcomed, as I have argued in an earlier CCP blog post. The requirement to prove ‘dishonesty’ should be undesirable in the area of competition law [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of these legislative developments should be welcomed, as I have argued in an earlier CCP blog post. The requirement to prove ‘dishonesty’ should be undesirable in the area of competition law [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BIS and the Cartel Offence: A Reasonable Attempt to Compensate for the Rejection of Dishonesty by CCP Seminar: Reforming the UK Cartel Offence &#124; research@ccp</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/bis-and-the-cartel-offence-a-reasonable-attempt-to-compensate-for-the-rejection-of-dishonesty/#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CCP Seminar: Reforming the UK Cartel Offence &#124; research@ccp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=694#comment-3422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] also Peter&#8217;s blog post from April 2012 on the rejection of &#8216;dishonesty&#8217; under the reformed cartel [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also Peter&#8217;s blog post from April 2012 on the rejection of &#8216;dishonesty&#8217; under the reformed cartel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monitor’s Advice to the OFT and the New Healthcare Regulation by Jolicoeur Law Chambers</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/monitors-advice-to-the-oft-and-the-new-healthcare-regulation/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jolicoeur Law Chambers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=814#comment-3393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post about Healthcare Regulation, thanks for sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post about Healthcare Regulation, thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monitor’s Advice to the OFT and the New Healthcare Regulation by Are calls to kill off NHS competition regulations misdirected? &#124; research@ccp</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/monitors-advice-to-the-oft-and-the-new-healthcare-regulation/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are calls to kill off NHS competition regulations misdirected? &#124; research@ccp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=814#comment-3366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mary recently wrote for our Competition Policy blog on the topic of &#8220;Monitor’s Advice to the OFT and the New Healthcare Regulation&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mary recently wrote for our Competition Policy blog on the topic of &#8220;Monitor’s Advice to the OFT and the New Healthcare Regulation&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Has the UK opened the floodgates to private enforcement of competition law? by Antritrust Links of the Week &#171; News &#171; UpwardPricingPressure</title>
		<link>http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/has-the-uk-opened-the-floodgates-to-private-enforcement-of-competition-law/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antritrust Links of the Week &#171; News &#171; UpwardPricingPressure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://competitionpolicy.wordpress.com/?p=809#comment-3286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] UK government proposes changes to the way private antitrust damages cases are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK government proposes changes to the way private antitrust damages cases are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
